An interview with Among Animals contributor Diane Lefer

An interview with Among Animals contributor Diane Lefer (“Alas, Falada!”)

Q: What inspired you to write this story?

 A: As you know, I’ve been a volunteer at the Los Angeles Zoo for over sixteen years in the research department. I should make it clear there’s no invasive, nasty research. It’s all about behavioral observation and providing data to improve their housing and conditions so that the animals can live in the most natural and psychologically satisfying way possible in captivity. Over the years I’ve seen the creation of wonderful natural habitats. I’ve seen the bonds between animals and each other and with the zookeepers. I’ve been involved in some conservation efforts for endangered species. I’ve also seen how some of the animals are as curious about us, humans, as we are about them. Several years ago, before the gorillas had the Campo Gorilla Reserve (their new environment complete with high grasses and trees, climbing rocks, a waterfall, and places to hide), people used to sit on a bench across from the small exhibit and blow kisses at the big primates. One day, Evie escaped. What did she do? She went to the bench, sat, and blew kisses at her fellow gorillas. And when a baby was born in the Campo Gorilla Reserve, I remember the new mother carrying it in her arms up to the glass and showing it off to the gathered humans.

But it still breaks my heart to see any living creature in captivity. So I have very conflicted emotions about the life and death of zoo animals. I also get annoyed when I come across animals being used in fiction as symbols. I wanted to write about them—at least try to—in a way that respected their integrity as fully realized living creatures.


 Q: At one point in the story, the narrator reflects, “If I could shed my humanness, I would.” What do you think are among the most important things humans can learn from animals?

A: From my cat, Desi, I learned a healthy way to trust. She showed every day that she loved me and trusted me with her life. At the same time she never hesitated to let me know when she disagreed with what I wanted. She showed me you can trust without relinquishing your own better judgment. If you express questions or objections or doubts, it doesn’t make you a suspicious, mean-spirited person. Blind obedience is not the same thing as trust.

There’s a lot more: I think as kids, we identify with animals and are always curious about them. Kids seem eager to find out all they can about animals, and that curiosity can open the door at an early age to enthusiasm about learning. I’ve written a bit about this for Wildlife Nation, which is a new initiative of the National Wildlife Federation. Its goal is to inspire kids to care about wildlife conservation while encouraging parents to get their children away from the on-screen virtual world and out into the natural world.

And we like to think animals are ruled by instinct, but when you’re around them, it’s clear there’s a wide range of temperament and behavior. Yet when it comes to human beings, we live at a time of standardized testing and one-size-fits-all. Animals are happy and well adjusted when their environment lets them develop and use their abilities. I wish our schools and the economic system that consigns millions of human kids to deprivation and poverty could understand that.

Q: How did your work at the Los Angeles Zoo influence this story?

A: Most of the time at the zoo, I’m observing the animals and have very little contact with people. But a couple of people did very much influence the story: Ruthie Yakushiji, a keeper who was transferred to research and told me stories; Anne La Rose, who invited me up to the Animal Health Center back in the days when she worked there. I should also acknowledge Tom Jacobson, a playwright who is also a senior vice president at the Natural Science Museum and told me about drawers full of beetles. I’m not fond of insects and would rather hear about them than be around them.

Q: Fairy tales such as the one you reference in “Alas, Falada!” can seem a bit scary to the children for whom they’re written. What effect did such stories have on you and how do you think they may have influenced your writing?

A: In fairy tales, for me, the princes and princesses and cobblers and swineherds were exotic. Only the animals were real. And in those stories, talking animals often befriend and help people in danger or facing some difficult challenge or quest.

I think it’s hard for children to relinquish the idea that animals—not just parrots—can use human speech. As a writer, I rely on words all the time, and I think anything you do all the time can get you into a rut so I love the change that occurs when you have to communicate nonverbally. As adults, we’re still seeking ways to do just that with the animal kingdom. We’re fascinated with nonhuman primates who communicate through sign language and pictograms. And studying animal behavior, you learn to interpret (the best you can) behavioral cues in zoos or in the wild. People who live with cats or dogs are always trying to interpret their nonverbal communication just as they try to understand us. There is something magical about that.


7 thoughts on “An interview with Among Animals contributor Diane Lefer”

  1. I enjoyed this interview, as I enjoyed reading “Alas, Falada!”, a story with perfect tempo and expert pathos. Thank you, Diane, for your contribution to AMONG ANIMALS and for your important work at the LA Zoo. I understand your conflicted feelings around zoos–I have them myself–but with shrinking habitat and other dangers, zoos do provide solutions, and your studies go a long way toward improving them.

  2. Thanks for your comments, Jean. I loved this story, too, and it does such a good job (like Mindy Mejia’s THE DRAGON KEEPER) of portraying the lives of animals in zoos and raises issues that are important to talk about and consider. Most of all, though, “Alas, Falada!” is just a beautiful read. So glad to have this story in the anthology.

  3. Great story! And great interview. I completely empathize with Diane’s points about nonverbal communication with other animals; it is part of what makes my relationships with other animals so important and meaningful and (may I say?) freeing, because we relate to each other in such different ways. Human communication places so much pressure and emphasis on the right words, the right inflection, the right tone. To be sure, human language is a great thing, but the absence of human language is not a poverty, and when I can communicate with my rabbits, for instance, through sheer touch and sound and taste (they like to share apples and bananas with me), my whole experience of myself as a complete animal-person is different.

    Thank you, Diane, also for pointing out how so many stories use animals only as symbols. It’s akin to the way so many stories have used female characters and nonwhite characters as novelties or stand-ins, when it’s clear that the storytellers have no interest in real flesh-and-blood people who have those characteristics. I’ve thought about this since I went to see Peter Jackson’s King Kong and listened to my friends debate the “meaning” of the story, when to me it was clear: animals should be allowed to live free, not be exploited as sideshows. But it was impossible to think that unless you took the animal character seriously as a real animal.

  4. Charlotte, thank you! Your story, “Meat,” blew my mind. It’s so disturbing, so sad, and yet gently (not always so gently) satirical in its portrayal of the smug progressive mind. I wrote to Midge Raymond earlier that I usually expect the stories in an anthology to be of uneven quality, but I’ve been startled and moved by story after story. I’m looking forward to reading a Q&A with you.

Comments are closed.